Forward-Deployed ML Engineering
Senior ML engineers. In your repo. Production in 6 weeks.
We embed a named engineer into your GitHub, CI/CD, and standup, ship a production agent in 2 to 6 weeks, and leave you with the eval harness, the runbook, and full IP ownership. Your stack. Your code. No platform license. No vendor attached runtime.
60 minutes with a senior engineer. No pitch deck. You leave with a written one pager.
50-100x
feature velocity on owned work
7 days
to first PR or pause billing
400K+
production emails sent on a system we built
Shipped to production for
- Monetizy.ai8K emails/day, week 1
- Upstate Remedial Management400K+ emails sent
- OpenLawCursor for Lawyers
- PriceFoxshared retrieval agent
- OpenArtcreative agent surface
What makes us different
Three things no direct peer combines
Engineers in your repo on day one
Named senior ML engineers write PRs inside your GitHub, use your CI/CD, and hand off a working eval harness and runbook when the engagement ends. Not a partner-plus-grads consulting stack. Not a license-attached FDE team. The code is yours.
Platform-agnostic, IP stays with you
We pick the right model and orchestration stack for each problem and sign away IP in writing. No Distillery, no Writer agent framework, no Glean lock-in. You own the repo, the weights layer, and the 12-month-out runbook.
Week-2 prototype, week-6 production, or pause billing
Specific milestones you can hold us to. 50-100x measurable throughput on the work we own. The counter to the MIT NANDA stat your boardroom quotes: yes, 95% of pilots fail, and here is the rubric for not being one of them.
Build vs buy vs forward deploy
The four options your board is weighing
Every VP of Data and AI we talk to is choosing between the same four doors. Here is what each one actually costs when the agent has to be in production.
| Hire in house | Big 4 consulting | AI platform vendor | fde10x | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Time to first shipped PR | 58 day hiring cycle, 6 to 12 week ramp | RFP, 8 week kickoff, partner plus grads | License plus 3 to 6 month integration | 7 days or we pause billing |
| Who writes the code | Your hire, once you find them | Rotating team, the senior you met is not on the PR | Their implementation partner, at their margin | Named senior engineer from the scoping call, on the SOW |
| IP, repo, eval harness | Yours, with the permanent liability | Mixed per MSA, often joint | Platform attached, you lease the runtime | Yours from clause one, in writing, before week 1 |
| Model and cloud choice | Your call | Usually the partner cloud (Microsoft, AWS) | Platform locked | Anthropic, OpenAI, Bedrock, Vertex, Azure, or open weight |
| Exit cost | $400K+ fully loaded, permanent | Retainer, hard to stop cleanly | Re platform in 12 to 18 months if you leave | Week 6 handoff, runbook in your repo, zero lock in |
| Risk gate | 90 day probation, then sunk cost | None, change order culture | Annual contract | Week 2 rubric with refund and exit clause |
The in house number assumes one staff level MLE at US market comp plus benefits, ramp, and management overhead. Big 4 assumptions are based on published government contract disclosures.
Shipped systems, not decks
Running in production, cited on the record
Named clients with shipped outcomes. No screenshot-only demos. No "case studies coming soon."
Monetizy.ai
AI email campaign orchestrator, ~8K emails/day, delivered in 1 week
LLM orchestration, retrieval, deliverability
Upstate Remedial Management
AI email client for auto-debts notice handling, 400K+ emails sent to date
Agentic email workflow, compliance checks, audit trail
OpenLaw
AI-native law editor ("Cursor for Lawyers"), publicly released
LLM product surface, legal-domain retrieval, eval harness
PriceFox
Shared retrieval agent at industry-leading performance via automated ML engineering pipeline
Multi-tenant retrieval, automated eval, research writeup
The engagement rubric
Week-by-week, not quarter-by-quarter
Week 0
Scoping call
60 minutes with a senior engineer. We scope one specific production outcome, not a 40-page roadmap.
Week 1
Engineer onboarded
Named engineer in your GitHub, Slack, and standup. First PR in 7 days or we pause billing.
Week 2
Prototype in your staging
Running on your stack, hitting your data, behind your feature flag.
Week 6
Production + handoff
Eval harness, runbook, and CI/CD in your repo. Your team owns the system from here.
Protocol-native
MCP-native. A2A-compatible. Runs on your Bedrock, Vertex, or Azure.
Procurement now filters on protocol specificity. We speak MCP (10,000+ servers, 97M monthly SDK downloads) and A2A (v1.0 with 150+ orgs including Microsoft, AWS, Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow).
The agent we ship runs where your security review already cleared. Not in a SaaS control plane you have to re-legal.
# Integrations you do not have to re-negotiate
model_provider: bedrock | vertex | azure_openai | anthropic
orchestration: langgraph | pydantic_ai | custom
retrieval: pgvector | turbopuffer | pinecone | your_own
protocol: mcp + a2a
eval: ragas + custom_rubric + human_review
ci: your_github_actions
deploy: your_infra
# What we explicitly do not bring
- no platform license
- no proprietary agent framework
- no vendor-attached runtime
The first four questions procurement asks
Before you book the call
Your board asked when the agent ships.
Let us put a date on it.
60-minute scoping call with a senior engineer. We leave you with a one-pager: the outcome we would own, the milestone rubric, and a named engineer to deliver it.
Book the callFree. 60 minutes. Senior engineer, not a sales rep.