Forward-Deployed ML Engineering

Senior ML engineers. In your repo. Production in 6 weeks.

We embed a named engineer into your GitHub, CI/CD, and standup, ship a production agent in 2 to 6 weeks, and leave you with the eval harness, the runbook, and full IP ownership. Your stack. Your code. No platform license. No vendor attached runtime.

60 minutes with a senior engineer. No pitch deck. You leave with a written one pager.

50-100x

feature velocity on owned work

7 days

to first PR or pause billing

400K+

production emails sent on a system we built

Shipped to production for

  • Monetizy.ai
  • Upstate Remedial Management
  • OpenLaw
  • PriceFox
  • OpenArt

What makes us different

Three things no direct peer combines

Engineers in your repo on day one

Named senior ML engineers write PRs inside your GitHub, use your CI/CD, and hand off a working eval harness and runbook when the engagement ends. Not a partner-plus-grads consulting stack. Not a license-attached FDE team. The code is yours.

Platform-agnostic, IP stays with you

We pick the right model and orchestration stack for each problem and sign away IP in writing. No Distillery, no Writer agent framework, no Glean lock-in. You own the repo, the weights layer, and the 12-month-out runbook.

Week-2 prototype, week-6 production, or pause billing

Specific milestones you can hold us to. 50-100x measurable throughput on the work we own. The counter to the MIT NANDA stat your boardroom quotes: yes, 95% of pilots fail, and here is the rubric for not being one of them.

Build vs buy vs forward deploy

The four options your board is weighing

Every VP of Data and AI we talk to is choosing between the same four doors. Here is what each one actually costs when the agent has to be in production.

Hire in houseBig 4 consultingAI platform vendorfde10x
Time to first shipped PR58 day hiring cycle, 6 to 12 week rampRFP, 8 week kickoff, partner plus gradsLicense plus 3 to 6 month integration7 days or we pause billing
Who writes the codeYour hire, once you find themRotating team, the senior you met is not on the PRTheir implementation partner, at their marginNamed senior engineer from the scoping call, on the SOW
IP, repo, eval harnessYours, with the permanent liabilityMixed per MSA, often jointPlatform attached, you lease the runtimeYours from clause one, in writing, before week 1
Model and cloud choiceYour callUsually the partner cloud (Microsoft, AWS)Platform lockedAnthropic, OpenAI, Bedrock, Vertex, Azure, or open weight
Exit cost$400K+ fully loaded, permanentRetainer, hard to stop cleanlyRe platform in 12 to 18 months if you leaveWeek 6 handoff, runbook in your repo, zero lock in
Risk gate90 day probation, then sunk costNone, change order cultureAnnual contractWeek 2 rubric with refund and exit clause

The in house number assumes one staff level MLE at US market comp plus benefits, ramp, and management overhead. Big 4 assumptions are based on published government contract disclosures.

Shipped systems, not decks

Running in production, cited on the record

Named clients with shipped outcomes. No screenshot-only demos. No "case studies coming soon."

Monetizy.ai

AI email campaign orchestrator, ~8K emails/day, delivered in 1 week

LLM orchestration, retrieval, deliverability

Upstate Remedial Management

AI email client for auto-debts notice handling, 400K+ emails sent to date

Agentic email workflow, compliance checks, audit trail

OpenLaw

AI-native law editor ("Cursor for Lawyers"), publicly released

LLM product surface, legal-domain retrieval, eval harness

PriceFox

Shared retrieval agent at industry-leading performance via automated ML engineering pipeline

Multi-tenant retrieval, automated eval, research writeup

The engagement rubric

Week-by-week, not quarter-by-quarter

Week 0

Scoping call

60 minutes with a senior engineer. We scope one specific production outcome, not a 40-page roadmap.

Week 1

Engineer onboarded

Named engineer in your GitHub, Slack, and standup. First PR in 7 days or we pause billing.

Week 2

Prototype in your staging

Running on your stack, hitting your data, behind your feature flag.

Week 6

Production + handoff

Eval harness, runbook, and CI/CD in your repo. Your team owns the system from here.

Protocol-native

MCP-native. A2A-compatible. Runs on your Bedrock, Vertex, or Azure.

Procurement now filters on protocol specificity. We speak MCP (10,000+ servers, 97M monthly SDK downloads) and A2A (v1.0 with 150+ orgs including Microsoft, AWS, Salesforce, SAP, ServiceNow).

The agent we ship runs where your security review already cleared. Not in a SaaS control plane you have to re-legal.

# Integrations you do not have to re-negotiate

model_provider: bedrock | vertex | azure_openai | anthropic

orchestration: langgraph | pydantic_ai | custom

retrieval: pgvector | turbopuffer | pinecone | your_own

protocol: mcp + a2a

eval: ragas + custom_rubric + human_review

ci: your_github_actions

deploy: your_infra

# What we explicitly do not bring

- no platform license

- no proprietary agent framework

- no vendor-attached runtime

The first four questions procurement asks

Before you book the call

Your board asked when the agent ships.
Let us put a date on it.

60-minute scoping call with a senior engineer. We leave you with a one-pager: the outcome we would own, the milestone rubric, and a named engineer to deliver it.

Book the call

Free. 60 minutes. Senior engineer, not a sales rep.